Supplemental Testimony before The New York State Assembly & New York State Senate

On February 15th I appeared as a panelist on the Joint Legislative Budget Hearing on Local Government Officials/ General Government. You can see my original testimony here as well as read my prepared remarks. Below is my supplemental testimony to answer questions that were under time constraints at the hearing.

Supplemental Testimony before The New York State Assembly & New York State Senate

Joint Legislative Budget Hearing on Local Government Officials/ General Government

Wednesday, March 1, 2023.

Dustin M. Czarny, NYSECA Democratic Caucus Chair

On February 15, 2023, I appeared before the Joint legislative Budget Hearing on Local Government Officials/General Government.  In the question-and-answer session several topics were discussed that time wasn’t allotted for full answers.  Here are my expanded answers on a few of the topics raised:

Even Year Elections (Senator Rachel May, Senator Rhodes, Senator Martins)

Stemming from discussion among several questioners I wanted to clarify my position on moving some municipal elections to even years.  The NYS Elections Commissioner Association as well as the Democratic Caucus that I chair has not voiced an official opinion on this proposed legislation.  Personally, I believe any move that will result in more voter participation is worthy of discussion. 

My first concern is on ballot length where logistically Throwing every elected office every two years could result in longer ballots and even two-page ballots.  However, that concern does not inherently prohibit my eventual support of this legislation.  I note that we actually have a ballot length issue in odd year elections.  There are generally more offices up in local years leading to longer ballots with further drop off in low turnout elections.  It does seem that moving some of those elections to even years could actually alleviate the ballot drop off issue.  It is also reasonable to believe that even with ballot drop off from the top of the ticket to the bottom that simply placing these elections in even years where voter participation can be well over 200% in odd years that more citizens would be making choices in their government is a benefit that would outweigh ballot length issues.

I believe that moving elections that service high number of voters should be targeted first for moving to even years.  Moving Countywide and County legislator elections first would actually even out the ballot length issues.  There would need to be constitutional changes for cities to move their elections and it may be worth waiting for that constitutional process to happen before moving towns and villages as well.  This way we could phase in these moves giving Boards of Elections time to implement the change.

Absentee Ballot Applications on Election Day (Assemblyman Jacobsen)

The NYS Elections Commissioner Association has given Bi-Partisan support for a mechanism that would allow Elections Commissioners flexibility to issue absentee ballots on Election Day, as proposed by Assemblyman Jacobson in A111.  Late emerging circumstances are a reality of our election process.  Currently on Election Day infirmed individuals have no explicit process to receive an absentee.  Giving commissioners the ability to approve Election Day absentee requests will allow those who have late unavoidable circumstances to still cast a ballot.

Full Time Commissioners (Assemblyman Jacobson, Senator Walczyk)

The NYS Elections Commissioner Association has given Bi-Partisan support for fulltime commissioners statewide.  Outside of NYC that have commissioners that meet monthly where executive director’s take the administrative leave, there are 17 counties currently that have part time commissioners ranging from Broome County with 120k voters to Schuyler County with 12k voters.  There are 40 other counties with full time commissioners, 26 of those counties fall into the same voter range as the 17 counties that have decided to have part-time commissioners. 

The modern elections commissioner must navigate heavier workflows and keep up with Electoral reforms.  In 2019 the political calendar changed moving the primary from September to June.  We also added in Early Voting and portable registration that same year.  In 2022 we added pre-canvassing of Absentee ballots that happen the 45 days preceding an election.  The implementation of online voter registration with the DMV in 2016 has increased our voter registration work and that will expand later this year with the new 10-day constitutional minimums and online and automatic voter registration. 

With all these improvements to out electoral system it has become necessary for commissioners to make daily decisions now more than ever.  Part time commissioners are often doing full time work for less pay and are leaving the profession.  We need full time dedicated commissioners to carryout the demanding job of our new political calendar.  Furthermore, fulltime positions will attract the best candidates to serve as elections commissioners and alleviate concerns over conflicts of interest created by the demands of finding other employment.

Voter Identification (Senator Rhodes)

We have limited voter identification in New York.  We currently require a voter to be verified upon registering to vote either through the Department of Motor Vehicles or Social Security Administration.  If a new voter is unable to do so, upon presenting themselves at the polls they will be required to furnish one of several pieces of identification.  After their initial voting experience we rely on the bipartisan checks at the polling places including signature checks to identify voters.  If a polling inspector believes a signature to be suspect, they can challenge voters and if they fail the challenge process an affidavit ballot that will be investigated post-election can be used.

This system has worked remarkably well.  By all independent accounts there is very little fraud in our system.  A 2014 study by the Washington post identified 31 credible instances of impersonation fraud from 200 to 2014, out of one billion votes cast.  In a 2017 study by the Brennan Center found that instances of voter fraud were so small it is more likely an American “will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.”.  In fact the most high profile instances of recent voter fraud, such as voters double voting with dual residencies or the troubling instances in Rennsselaer county  revolve around absentee voting fraud.  Such fraud while unfortunate and rare would not be resolved by an in-person voter identification requirement.

Voter Identification, as implemented in every state that has required it, is suppressive in it’s very nature.  Often it acts as a barrier to younger, elderly, minority, and economically distressed populations.  There is usually a cost to voter identification creating an inherent poll tax for many eligible voters.  Also there are usually discrepancies in what is considered valid IDS, often state issued student IDS are not deemed valid but gun and hunting licenses are.  The Brennan Center has collected a comprehensive list of third party studies that show the suppressive nature of voting id laws.

Since In-Person Voting Fraud has been proven to be rare and a non-factor in US elections.  Voter ID has been shown to be suppressive in nature and cost prohibitive in implementation.  IN short, Voter ID laws are a solution pretending to fix a non-existent problem while creating many other problems that would have a negative effect on our electoral system.  It is not needed in New York in my professional opinion.

Urban falloff in voter participation (Senator Martins)

In response to Senator Martins question about a disparity in turnout in suburban and urban parts of his district, this is not abnormal behavior.  Urban populations tend to have many factors that have lower turnout.  Urban populations are younger and poorer than their suburban counterparts.  Both of those populations have many social and economic reasons that result in lower participation in elections.  Also lack of competition in urban areas can hurt their performance in a General Election.  High polarization has left cities being dominated by single parties and often after the primary election there are no viable general election races.  The same can be found in the most rural parts of our state as well.

This underscores the need for an investment by New York in funds for Voter Education.  This is a bi-partisan request of the New York Elections Commissioner Association and often left out of county budgets who fund our Bi-partisan Election Boards.  These funds can be targeted to traditionally low turnout populations to educate on polling hours, location, and ballot options for those voters.

Village Elections in the Fall (Assemblyman Brown)

I am a proponent of moving village elections out of the March and June calendars and into the November.  In my county we have encouraged 5 of our 17 villages to move elections to the November calendar.  Those 5 villages are about as different as can be.  We have a large partisan village that run on party lines (Solvay), 1 small partisan village in Elbridge that runs on party lines, one larger village in East Syracuse that runs on non-partisan lines, and two small villages Camillus and Tully that traditionally run on non-partisan lines.  In all 5 villages the move to November saved them 100% of their election costs and saw turnout increases from 25% to 900% in their elections.  None of the non-partisan villages were forced to run on party lines.  I reject the notion that smaller turnout electorates are somehow better at deciding their elected leadership.  In general the higher rate of turnout results in elected leadership that is more connected with all of their residents needs and supported by that same electorate.

I also believe it is unfair to village clerks to expect them to carry out the modern election reforms that we have in New York.  March and June Village elections run by village clerks are not required to have the absentee voting practices of pre-canvass and curing of ballots.  They also often do not have access to modern voting equipment and ballot design and have resulted in some of the While village elections run by Boards of Elections do result in better run elections and some access to absentee reforms for the village voters, other reforms are still absent.  March and June village elections do not have Early Voting and affidavit ballot voting.  Village voters deserve access to these reforms and is one of the reasons why Village elections should happen in November with other elections.

Dustin M. Czarny

Commissioner (D), Onondaga County

Democratic Caucus Chair, NYS Elections Commissioner Association.

Commissioner in a Car: Designating Petitions begin today.

Welcome to the official beginning of the NY political season as designating petitions start today. Volunteers are going around door to door to get heir candidates on the ballot. I tell you why in this podcast. Enjoy.

https://anchor.fmzoomwithczarny

Subscribe to dustinczarny.com for all content and election news updates

The Weekly Wonk: The Village of Fayetteville

Welcome back to the #WeeklyWonk. Each weekend I release an article on a subject relating to elections in Onondaga County and New York State. Often these articles will have detailed stats to consume but sometimes they will be a recap of a prominent issue or on relevant election law. I am turning my eye to the 2023 elections. This week I take a break from looking at the political subdivisions and focus on a work item from the Onondaga County Board of elections. Today I look at the Village of Fayetteville who is having a special election this March.

The Village of Fayetteville is located inside the Town of Manlius.  Villages The Village Board and Mayor have decided to hold their elections in the traditional March election period.  Normally their elections are on even years, just having a village elections last year.  That is also the first year the Onondaga County Board of Elections ran this village election, after a problematic ballot in 2020. There is a special election this year to fill a vacancy of a village board member this year. The Town Of Manlius Democratic Committee started running candidates on the Democratic line in 2022 and thus it is a great subject for my #WeeklyWonk series.

The Village of Fayetteville has morphed into a strong Democratic plurality community.  Democrats have 41% of the electorate. The Non-enrolled actually now outnumbers the GOP at 27% to the GOP 26%.  This type of enrollment advantage is probably why we see the Town of Manlius Democratic committee running candidates on partisan lines while the Town of Manlius GOP committee has decided not to.  This changes from village to village and we see the opposite in GOP run villages like Elbridge and Liverpool.  The Village of Fayetteville is made up of five different Election Districts, Manlius 5,7,8,17, & 21.  The largest voter population is in 17 (23%) and smallest in 5 (17%), with 7 (19%), 8 (20%), and 21 (21%) lumped in the middle.

In 2012 the Onondaga County Board of Elections started to place the villages inside election district boundaries after the redistricting year.  This allows us to run their elections if they wish as well as make it easier to track voter registration over time.  The Village of Fayetteville has experiences the changes we have seen in the Town of Manlius overall, a definitive switch to Democratic enrollment.  Democrats have gained 308 voters and the GOP has lost 177 voters since 2012.  The non-enrolled voter has gained 127 voters.

When we look at the election district partisan breakdown, we see that Democrats in enrollment dominate each ED as well.  Manlius 17 has the largest Democratic enrollment as well as partisan advantage to GOP.  Manlius 5 and Manlius 21 the non-enrolled outnumber the GOP as well.  But even in Manlius 7 & 8 have large Democratic enrollments now.

The Village of Fayetteville voter enrollment has grown moderately since 2012 gaining 258 voters or a growth of 7.66%. The 3 most Democratically leaning eds, Manlius 5, 17, & 21 also happen to be the ones showing the lions share of the growth since 2012.  Manlius 7 & 8, the more traditionally aligned eds, and Eds that were once GOP, are some of the smaller growths in voter population for the village.

The Democratic growth in each ED is outpacing the voter growth in four of the 5 eds.  Manlius 21 was already fairly Democratic in 2012 so it the partisan advantage got better, but not dramatically so (Dem +7.59% gain). Manlius 7 (Dem +16.65% gain), 8 (Dem +15.89% gain), & 17 (Dem +21.09% gain) were GOP districts in 2012 and flipped to Democratic districts in 2023 showing the most growth.  Manlius 5 was a slightly Democratic district in 2012 and have become a solidly Democratic district now (Dem +14.41% gain).

When it comes to comparative races the village of Fayetteville performs as a solidly Democratic subdivision.  In all 4 of the comparative races the Village of Fayetteville outperforms Onondaga County as a whole.  In 2022 for Governor it gave Kathy Hochuli Democrat 64.30% of the vote, +10.52 points from her countywide win.  In 2021 it voted for Anthony Brindisi Democrat for Supreme Court garnered 60.30%, +7.80 points from his countywide win (though he lost in other counties). In 2020 Joe Biden won Fayetteville with 66.96% of the vote, +8.08% from his countywide win.  And in 2019 Mark Kolinski won Fayetteville with 55.03% of the vote, improving on his countywide loss by +7.30%.  The last village election is not included because it was a vote for two village board election with Democrats running 2candidates and a 3rd candidate running on a non-partisan line so it doesn’t compare well  However those results were Democrat & Fayetteville Neighbors party Mark Matt 583 votes, Balance Party Mike Small 518 votes, Democrat and Fayetteville Neighbors Party Casey Cleary 471 votes.  In the 2023 March Village elections there is only one candidate for the Town village Board petition, Democrat Jane Rice is running on the Democratic line and another independent Fayetteville Voices line.

That is, it for this week’s edition of the Weekly Wonk.  Next week I will focus on the Village of Manlius who is also having an election in March.  For my #weeklyWonks this year I will be adding in villages that have partisan elections in them as well as my individual look at the towns, county legislature districts.  So, stay tuned. Subscribe to dustinczarny.com for all election news and content updates.

Democrats on the party changing its presidential primary calendar – WXXI Connections

I appeared on WXXI Connections to discuss the Democrats changing their primary calendar. You can listen to this hour long program below where I gave some insight on why I believe this was a good move and answered host and listener questions.

https://www.wxxinews.org/show/connections/2023-02-24/democrats-on-the-party-changing-its-presidential-primary-calendar

Zoom with Czarny Dana Balter and Karen Wharton of Citizen Action NY

This week I talk to an old friend, Dana Balter, and new friend Karen Wharton of Citizen Action NY. We dive deep into the public campaign finance system that launched this year for NY Assembly, Senate, and statewide offices starting in 2024. Enjoy.

Find out more about Citizen Action NY at https://citizenactionny.org/

Subscribe to dustinczarny.com for all content and election news updates.

Commissioner in a Car: Enrollment reports are pulled…signature requirements coming soon

This week I talk about the work the County Board of Elections is doing to get signature requirements and enrollment statistics done in time for next week’s start of designating petitions. Enjoy.

https://anchor.fm/zoomwithczarny

Subscribe to dustinczarny.com for all content and election news updates

The Weekly Wonk: 2023 Redistricting

Welcome back to the #WeeklyWonk. Each weekend I release an article on a subject relating to elections in Onondaga County and New York State. Often these articles will have detailed stats to consume but sometimes they will be a recap of a prominent issue or on relevant election law. I am turning my eye to the 2023 elections. This week I take a break from looking at the political subdivisions and focus on a work item from the Onondaga County Board of elections. Today I look at the effect of redistricting in 2023 on the Syracuse Common Council districts and Onondaga County Legislature.

Redistricting dominated the 2022 political landscape and will continue to do so in 2023.  The five City of Syracuse Common Council districts and 17 Onondaga County Legislative districts underwent redistricting in 2022.  That means in 2023 candidates will be running in new districts.  The process to get to the new districts could not be more different. In the City of Syracuse they instituted a citizen led redistricting panel that redraw the city districts over a year long process that resulted in acceptable maps based on neighborhoods.  In the County a hastily convened redistricting process that took place over 30 days resulted in vetoed maps, even more hastily drawn maps by the county legislature, and now an ongoing lawsuit.  

Looking at the above charts we can see the overall voter population in each district.  No matter the process redistricting is based on overall population.  This can lead to a wide variety on voter population.  Urban populations tend to be registered at less rates than suburban populations. In Syracuse this is because of a large non-citizen population as well students from Syracuse University and Lemoyne who may be registered at their home addresses.  We see that the City districts for the OCL (7,8,9,15,16,17) tend to have lower voter populations than the suburban districts.  The same is true inside the City of Syracuse Common Council districts as northside district CC1  with a large new American population and CC3 the home of student populations for Syracuse University and Lemoyne University lags behind the rest of the city districts.

The new City Common Council districts are still essentially the same as the old ones in terms of partisan advantage.  In every district Democrats dominate the partisan enrollment. Like in the previous districts, cc1 is the only district where Democrats have only a an overwhelming plurality of voters instead of a dominating majority like in districts 2, 3, 4, and 5.  In every district the GOP is relegated to third party status falling well behind the non-enrolled voters.

To analyze the County legislative districts, I am dividing them into three categories, Safe Democrat, Competitive seats, and Safe GOP.  The 6 seats currently held by the Onondaga County legislature Democrats are considered to be safe Democratic seats.  They all have significant portions of the City of Syracuse with 3 seats wholly inside the City (9,15,16) and 2 seat sharing a portions of the Democratic town of Dewitt (7 & 17) and 1 having a micro portion of the swing town of Geddes (8).  These districts, like the Syracuse Common Council districts, have either overwhelming plurality Democratic enrollment (7,8,9) or Democratic majorities (15,16,17).  All districts the GOP is in third party status trailing the non-enrolled by a great amount.

The competitive seats in our county are currently all held by the GOP.  Under the new maps these seats have mostly Democratic pluralities (with the exception of OCL 11).  OCL 2, an open seat as Jim Rowley is not seeking another term and OCL 4 held by Colleen Gunnip, and OCL  5 (held by Deborah Cody), have non-enrolled advantages over the GOP.  OCL 10 has a the largest Democratic enrollment advantage and has had spectacularly close elections the last three cycles under the old map.  OCL 11 & OCL 14 are, by the numbers, swing districts with nearly even enrollment between the two parties.

The five SAFE GOP seats are OCL 1,3,6,12,& 13.  All five districts have distinct GOP pluralities. The Democrats are solidly in second place ahead of the non-enrolled.  However Democrats tend to have a disadvantage in county legislative seats as they are held in low turnout years and Democratic populations turn out a lesser rate than the GOP.  It is a harder race for a Democrat to win in these districts and most likely would need a third-party split, open seat, or an unpopular incumbent to be able to win in these races.

One of the ways to measure the effect of redistricting is to see if there is a partisan effect before and after redistricting.  Our registration vendor at the OCBOE pulled registration reports of the Common Council districts before redistricting maps were applied and after.  I compared the data to see if there was a partisan shift in each of the districts. A positive number means it shifted toward the Democrats and a negative towards the GOP.

The City of Syracuse had the most radical redrawing in this round of redistricting.  However the most conservative district, cc1, was barely changed in its partisan makeup.  CC5 got more GOP as it gave up the east side for Eastwood and Sedgewick neighborhoods and CC3 got the most Democratic as it gave up Strathmore neighborhoods for university populations.  CC 2 got a little more conservative as it absorbed the Strathmore neighborhoods.

The Safe Democratic seats on the County Leg saw little change for most of the districts with small swings for OCL 8,9, and 16 seeing small partisan shifts.  OCL 15 is the biggest shift as it was taken from a split seat half in Geddes and Onondaga and half in the city and made an entirely city seat.  OCLY 17 got significantly more Conservative but still majority Democratic as it lost some of the city representation and gained more conservative portions of Dewitt.

As we analyze the GOP held seats we can see the true partisan effect of the County legislature redistricting process.  When looking at the competitive seats we noticeable partisan shifts for 5 of the 6 competitive seats.  We also see 3 of the 5 Safe GOP seats get more red.  Of the three seats held by the GOP that shifted Democrat, one was held by Julie Abbott and already the most GOP seat in the county.  The other two held by Jim Rowley (2) and Ken Bush (13) just happened to be the only two GOP legislators calling for fairer maps during the process. They were also frequent critics of Ryan McMahon whose staff drew the maps in place and ended up being part of a coup to wrestle the Onondaga County Legislative chairmanship away from David Knapp.

That is it for this week’s edition of the #WeeklyWonk.  IF you want to read more about the Redistricting Lawsuit that is still challenging the County Maps go here. Next week I will look at the Village of Fayetteville as we prepare for their elections on March 21, 2023.  Remember to subscribe to dustinczarny.com for all election news and content updates.

Czarny’s Seminar: How to get on the Ballot 2023

This is my first Czarny’s Seminar of 2023. I go over the various ways to get on the ballot if you are interested in running for public office. I touch on Designating, Opportunity to Ballot, and Independent nominating petitions. I also touch on caucuses and judicial conventions. Enjoy.

https://anchor.fm/zoomwithczarny

Subscribe to dustinczarny.com for all election news and content updates.

2023 Testimony Local Government Officials/ General Government – New York State Budget Public Hearing

I appeared on behalf of the NYS Elections Commissioner Association and my Democratic Caucus of Commissioner to ask for NYS Funding for county Board of Elections as well as capital funding to replace equipment. Members also asked questions on Voter ID, Moving elections to even years, and proper timing of village elections. Enjoy. Written testimony and supplemental written testimony will be added below.

The Local Government Hearing can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5uu6g_YLlA&t=26762s

Full written testimony below

Testimony before The New York State Assembly & New York State Senate

Joint Legislative Budget Hearing on Local Government Officials/ General Government

Wednesday, February15, 2023.

Dustin M. Czarny, NYSECA Democratic Caucus Chair

Thank you for letting me testify today.  My name is Dustin Czarny and I am an Elections Commissioner in Onondaga County and the Democratic Caucus Chair of the New York State Elections Commissioner Association.  NYSECA represents the diverse 62 counties throughout New York State.  I proud of our bi-partisan Election Board system and I truly believe this is a model that should be followed nationwide.  The Democratic and Republican Commissioners must work together to ensure the integrity of our election system.  The built-in checks and balances helps NY avoid the partisan battles we see unfolding in other States.  Commissioners must find ways to put partisan ideologies aside to meet the needs of the voters. 

The Board of Elections have faced many hurdles over the last few years and has risen to the challenge.  Since 2019 we have implemented election reforms such as Early Voting, Electronic Pollbooks, Universal transfer of registrations.  We have administered one of the highest turnout Presidential elections in modern history.  We have revamped a robust system of delivering absentee ballots to voters at the highest volume in NYS history.  Implementing a cure system to prevent accidental disenfranchisement of absentee voters over technical deficiencies.  We have done all that in the middle of a multi-year pandemic that challenged the very nature of our mostly in-person voting system and put the health of our election workers at risk.  While no system that is made up of human workers is without its flaws, our Boards have risen to the challenge, and kept our electoral system afloat in New York.

In 2023 and beyond there are more reforms the NYS Legislature has charged our boards with implementing.  Last year we took on the task of canvassing absentee ballots before Election Day, ending New York’s infamous run of being last in the nation to certify our results.  We will expand Early Voting opening more sites than the last few years.  This years we will take on online and automatic voter registration which will swell our voter rolls and make it easier for New Yorkers to register and update their voter registration.  The Democratic caucus of commissioners looks forward to these challenges as they will improve the lives of voters and participation in our Electoral system.

I would be remiss however not to point out that with these added burdens will come added burdens.  The expansion of Early Voting will mean more inspectors with more pay as minimum wage increases and expanded weekend hours add to our costs.  We will need to bring in additional personnel to conduct the early canvass of absentees before Election Day as our regular personnel are tied up with Early Voting and Election Day preparation.  We need additional equipment such as high speed scanners, sorting equipment, and rolling our electronic poll books on Election Day as well as on demand ballot printers.  Additionally we have an aging fleet of Election Day scanners that is in desperate need of replacement.

These added costs are met with skepticism and resistance from our host counties.  The politicization of our electoral process is not just something happening in other states, it has been happening on the local level as well.  Host counties made up of elected leaders who are hostile to these voting reforms refuse to give more than minimum funding to our Boards of Elections.  This resistance is in part because of our independence and in part because of the national ideological battle over the right to free and fair elections.  Too often the Election Boards are after thoughts for county budgeting and they are resistant to our requests to cover the added duties put upon us by State Government.

The Executive budget comes along way for providing the necessary funding for the New York State Board of Elections.  This is righting many years of misery when it comes to funding the State Board of Elections.  It is a welcome and important step as the State Board of Elections will be a vital partner for County Boards.  The State Board of Elections will shoulder the burden of Online and Automatic voter registration as well as tracking of our absentee ballots and the Campaign and Public Finance systems.  However the Executive Budget only appropriates old unspent Aid to Localities and Capital Funding will help some counties who are behind on upgrading their systems.  However we need new and substantial funding for all counties going forward.

New York State must play a role in funding elections at the County level.  The burdens that County Boards face in 2023 are similar to those we faced in 2019.  We need similar funding.  In 2019 we received $10 million in Aid to Localities and $25 million in capital funding.  This level of funding will allow for our boards to hire personnel to accomplish the absentee staffing and staff expanded Early Voting centers.  The Capital funding will allow us to expand Electronic Poll Books for use on Election Day statewide as well as purchasing technological advances for canvassing and reporting Absentee results alongside Election and Early Voting results in a timely manner.  It will also allow many counties to start replacing their aging Election Day scanners as next generation machines are set to be certified by the New York State Board of Elections over the next 6 months.

We have aging electronic poll books that are in need of being upgrade. Similarly many counties have precinct scanner fleets that are in desperate need of replacement.  Next generation precinct scanners are being approved by the NYS Board of Elections this year.  Providing funding to counties to be able to replace their fleets is necessary to ensure every voter in every county has the same Election Day and Early Voting experience.  We also would like dedicated funding and/or grants for voter outreach and education, a source of funding not provided by most counties to the Election Boards.  These funding requests have the bi-partisan support of the entire NYS Elections Commissioner Association.

We must also protect our Board of Elections from interference from local elected officials.  Often the existence of state funding is a reason for county offices to use that instead of committing the appropriate amount of local dollars.  This often results in no net revenue for local board of elections to accomplish their added burdens.  We need to establish minimum staffing levels tied to voter registration rolls for each county Board of Elections.  We need mandates for full time commissioners as our political calendars demand input and guidance year round.  These guidelines can be established and monitored by our State Board of Elections to maintain the independence we need of our Boards of Elections while assuring that counties and New York State give the vital resources for us to accomplish our mission.

Thank you very much for this opportunity to testify today.  I hope that we can count on the legislatures support in defending our democracy here in New York.

Dustin M. Czarny

Commissioner (D), Onondaga County

Democratic Caucus Chair, NYS Elections Commissioner Association.